0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:26s
Assists on a map
12.964.4098
Damage (total/round)
47573
Player score (round)
50621011
Damage (total/round)
38273
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Knife kills
11
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
46%
Ancient
17%
Mirage
8%
Nuke
2%
Anubis
1%
Inferno
0%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
52
Ancient
83%
24
5
Mirage
71%
14
20
Nuke
63%
19
16
Anubis
63%
19
15
Inferno
64%
11
18
Vertigo
63%
19
9
Last 5 maps
Overpass
46%
13
26
Ancient
100%
1
66
Mirage
63%
24
6
Nuke
65%
26
9
Anubis
62%
34
21
Inferno
64%
11
35
Vertigo
63%
27
4
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs paiN by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and paiN, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Nuke, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was exit.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were exit contributed 36 kills and saffee contributed 32 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17666 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
paiN analytics
The team paiN managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for paiN were nqz contributed 36 kills and biguzera contributed 29 kills. 17012 of total damage by paiN could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, paiN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments