0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
16.74.7
Shots (total/round)
8616
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
36251011
Player score (round)
51951011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
50%
Ancient
17%
Mirage
12%
Nuke
9%
Vertigo
3%
Anubis
2%
Inferno
1%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
50%
12
24
Ancient
100%
1
59
Mirage
61%
23
3
Nuke
65%
20
9
Vertigo
62%
26
4
Anubis
61%
31
18
Inferno
63%
8
34
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
45
Ancient
83%
23
5
Mirage
73%
11
17
Nuke
56%
16
13
Vertigo
59%
17
9
Anubis
59%
17
15
Inferno
64%
11
13
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of paiN vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between paiN and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Vertigo, Nuke, Anubis, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was saffee.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 40 out of 74 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Anubis. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were saffee contributed 58 kills and brnz4n contributed 53 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 27980 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
paiN analytics
The team paiN managed to secure 34 out of 74 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 8 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for paiN were biguzera contributed 55 kills and lux contributed 48 kills. 24596 of total damage by paiN could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, paiN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments