MIBR Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

15

5

+6

91

7:1

6

1

7.6

+18%

16

13

6

+3

69

0:1

3

1

6.3

+2%

12

18

10

-6

68

3:3

4

1

5.8

-17%

16

20

5

-4

70

1:1

3

0

5.6

-6%

18

18

3

0

72

1:5

2

0

5.4

-9%

Total

83

84

29

-1

370

12:11

18

3

6.1

-2%

paiN Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

18

13

+1

94

2:0

4

0

7.2

+5%

17

18

11

-1

84

4:4

2

2

6.6

-4%

17

14

2

+3

64

1:1

5

0

6.0

-1%

16

17

5

-1

71

0:3

5

0

5.6

+3%

14

18

6

-4

55

3:3

4

0

5.3

-17%

Total

83

85

37

-2

368

10:11

20

2

6.1

-3%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs paiN by the Bo3.gg Team

MIBR on Anubis Analysis

MIBR demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MIBR on Anubis were saffee, who contributed 21 kills, and exit, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8871 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


paiN on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for paiN, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for paiN on Anubis included lux, who contributed 19 kills, and biguzera, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8839 total damage, paiN couldn't prevent MIBR from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, paiN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date