0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:24s
USP kills on a map
41.5986
Molotov damage (avg/round)
62
Galil kills on a map
51.8168
Galil damage (avg/round)
17.16
Player score (round)
37961010
Player score (round)
35021010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
62%
Mirage
23%
Dust II
14%
Vertigo
13%
Ancient
7%
Nuke
5%
Inferno
4%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
62%
42
4
Mirage
39%
23
34
Dust II
67%
3
34
Vertigo
67%
36
3
Ancient
64%
28
10
Nuke
61%
28
24
Inferno
64%
14
27
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
78
Mirage
62%
42
9
Dust II
53%
17
27
Vertigo
54%
26
19
Ancient
71%
34
16
Nuke
56%
34
20
Inferno
60%
35
18
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs Fluxo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Fluxo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was Nicks.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were exit contributed 19 kills and saffee contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8154 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Fluxo analytics
The team Fluxo managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Fluxo were Nicks contributed 24 kills and piriajr contributed 16 kills. 7818 of total damage by Fluxo could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Fluxo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments