Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
46.716.3
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.12.1
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4482
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
15.94.1
Player score (round)
57311010
Player score (round)
42951010
Player score (round)
41521010
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
63%
Vertigo
21%
Inferno
20%
Dust II
10%
Mirage
8%
Nuke
2%
Ancient
1%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
63%
32
10
Vertigo
73%
37
4
Inferno
73%
15
20
Dust II
50%
2
19
Mirage
53%
15
33
Nuke
65%
26
26
Ancient
68%
25
8
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
82
Vertigo
52%
21
35
Inferno
53%
34
29
Dust II
60%
10
15
Mirage
61%
38
9
Nuke
63%
41
12
Ancient
69%
35
12
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs Fluxo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Fluxo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Vertigo, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was insani.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 26 out of 33 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were insani contributed 35 kills and brnz4n contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14592 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Fluxo analytics
The team Fluxo managed to secure 7 out of 33 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Fluxo were Nicks contributed 22 kills and Lucaozy contributed 20 kills. 10414 of total damage by Fluxo could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Fluxo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments