0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.2
5.9
Inferno0.3
Win Rounds
13
11
Inferno2
Kills
77
74
Inferno3
Damage
8.42K
7.82K
Inferno597
Economy
508.75K
535.8K
Inferno-27050
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
71.8161
Player score (round)
39781011
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
71%
Mirage
58%
Ancient
55%
Nuke
L
33%
Overpass
30%
Anubis
L
24%
Inferno
L
12%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Mirage
0%
0
2
Ancient
0%
2
1
Nuke
33%
3
0
Overpass
50%
2
0
Anubis
60%
5
1
Inferno
75%
4
1
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
71%
17
9
Mirage
58%
19
7
Ancient
55%
33
4
Nuke
0%
0
42
Overpass
80%
10
7
Anubis
36%
14
17
Inferno
63%
24
10
Info
Match analysis of LOADING vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LOADING and Endpoint, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by LOADING. The MVP of this match was SIXER.
LOADING analytics
The team LOADING secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LOADING were SIXER contributed 18 kills and Revol contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8389 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LOADING held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Endpoint analytics
The team Endpoint managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Endpoint were sl3nd contributed 16 kills and MiGHTYMAX contributed 12 kills. 7820 of total damage by Endpoint could not prevent LOADING from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Endpoint struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments