Teams advantage
Score
5.7
6.2
Inferno0.3
Win Rounds
10
13
Inferno3
Kills
70
73
Inferno3
Damage
7.8K
8.55K
Inferno755
Economy
826.65K
781.2K
Inferno-39500
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
31.5986
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3011
USP kills on a map
31.5986
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3011
Headshots on a map
15.840.318
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Speed Round (sec)
00:23s01:55s
Player score (round)
36891010
Player score (round)
37761010
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
63%
Ancient
62%
Dust II
53%
Nuke
47%
Anubis
20%
Inferno
10%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
63%
8
1
Ancient
62%
29
0
Dust II
70%
10
2
Nuke
67%
3
3
Anubis
56%
27
0
Inferno
50%
14
1
Mirage
50%
14
3
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
2
0
Dust II
17%
6
0
Nuke
20%
5
0
Anubis
36%
11
0
Inferno
40%
5
0
Mirage
50%
2
0
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of L&G vs LOADING by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between L&G and LOADING, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Inferno, and victory was secured by LOADING. The MVP of this match was Razzmo.
LOADING analytics
The team LOADING secured 26 out of 41 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Inferno. They also successfully set 15 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LOADING were Razzmo contributed 37 kills and TheManu999 contributed 26 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14712 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LOADING held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
L&G analytics
The team L&G managed to secure 15 out of 41 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for L&G were Malkiss contributed 34 kills and kr1vda contributed 30 kills. 13211 of total damage by L&G could not prevent LOADING from securing the victory
On the defensive side, L&G struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments