0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5.6
6.3
Mirage0.8
Win Rounds
22
32
Mirage5
Kills
163
195
Mirage19
Damage
18.81K
21.81K
Mirage1894
Economy
1.09M
1.19M
Mirage85800
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP damage (avg/round)
16.34.6
Molotov damage (avg/round)
82
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:44s00:39s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
7230
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
36511012
Player score (round)
36751012
Player score (round)
36941012
Player score (round)
37221012
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Info
Match analysis of Hyperion vs Shimmer by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Hyperion and Shimmer, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Mirage, and victory was secured by Shimmer. The MVP of this match was empathy.
Shimmer analytics
The team Shimmer secured 32 out of 55 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Mirage. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Shimmer were empathy contributed 63 kills and Bouchard contributed 36 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21808 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Shimmer held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Hyperion analytics
The team Hyperion managed to secure 22 out of 55 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Hyperion were Kionetta contributed 40 kills and artStar contributed 39 kills. 18806 of total damage by Hyperion could not prevent Shimmer from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Hyperion struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments