Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.12
Galil kills on a map
51.8161
Galil damage (avg/round)
20.45.7
Eco wins full buy
1
Damage (total/round)
42573
Player score (round)
51101011
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
50431011
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
80%
Overpass
67%
Mirage
57%
Vertigo
36%
Nuke
14%
Anubis
14%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
80%
10
4
Overpass
0%
0
31
Mirage
82%
11
5
Vertigo
80%
10
8
Nuke
70%
10
9
Anubis
77%
13
5
Inferno
67%
6
10
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
34
Overpass
67%
12
5
Mirage
25%
8
6
Vertigo
44%
16
10
Nuke
56%
9
9
Anubis
63%
16
4
Inferno
67%
12
6
Last results
Info
Match analysis of Grayhound vs Rooster by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Grayhound and Rooster, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Grayhound. The MVP of this match was INS.
Grayhound analytics
The team Grayhound secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Grayhound were INS contributed 39 kills and dexter contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18156 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Grayhound held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Rooster analytics
The team Rooster managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Rooster were nettik contributed 37 kills and asap contributed 38 kills. 16672 of total damage by Rooster could not prevent Grayhound from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Rooster struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments