0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Headshots (total/map)
248
AK47 kills on a map
136.5019
USP kills on a map
31.6027
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4482
AK47 kills on a map
166.5019
GLOCK kills on a map
21.4482
Galil kills on a map
71.8164
Headshots (total/map)
268
AK47 kills on a map
146.5019
M4A1 kills on a map
84.4189
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
33%
Mirage
31%
Inferno
27%
Anubis
15%
Nuke
8%
Ancient
1%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
2
Mirage
42%
12
0
Inferno
30%
10
7
Anubis
60%
15
2
Nuke
50%
2
9
Ancient
67%
12
1
Vertigo
0%
1
4
Last 5 maps
Dust II
33%
3
4
Mirage
73%
15
7
Inferno
57%
23
0
Anubis
45%
11
5
Nuke
58%
12
1
Ancient
68%
25
1
Vertigo
0%
0
13
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of GR vs ATOX by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GR and ATOX, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by ATOX. The MVP of this match was MiQ.
ATOX analytics
The team ATOX secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ATOX were MiQ contributed 45 kills and yAmi contributed 47 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21431 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ATOX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GR analytics
The team GR managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GR were weqt2 contributed 40 kills and mediocrity contributed 35 kills. 18447 of total damage by GR could not prevent ATOX from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments