0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:26s
HE damage (avg/round)
15.93.4
USP damage (avg/round)
13.34.7
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3023
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
15.33.5
Galil kills on a map
31.8171
Galil damage (avg/round)
17.35.8
Deagle damage (avg/round)
16.35.4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
25%
Nuke
17%
Anubis
14%
Inferno
6%
Ancient
2%
Dust II
0%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
46%
13
1
Nuke
33%
3
16
Anubis
59%
17
1
Inferno
38%
8
15
Ancient
69%
16
1
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
1
5
Last 5 maps
Mirage
71%
17
12
Nuke
50%
12
0
Anubis
45%
11
8
Inferno
44%
18
1
Ancient
67%
21
2
Dust II
0%
0
4
Vertigo
0%
0
17
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of GR vs ATOX by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GR and ATOX, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Inferno, and victory was secured by ATOX. The MVP of this match was kabal.
ATOX analytics
The team ATOX secured 26 out of 36 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Inferno. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ATOX were kabal contributed 36 kills and Zesta contributed 32 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15141 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ATOX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GR analytics
The team GR managed to secure 10 out of 36 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GR were weqt2 contributed 28 kills and mediocrity contributed 22 kills. 11040 of total damage by GR could not prevent ATOX from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments