0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
2615.0371
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
12.13.4
Eco wins full buy
1
Damage (total/round)
38273
Player score (round)
35151012
Player score (round)
37411012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
43%
Train
40%
Inferno
24%
Mirage
17%
Nuke
10%
Vertigo
4%
Dust II
1%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
5
30
Train
40%
10
21
Inferno
29%
17
8
Mirage
57%
14
6
Nuke
58%
19
5
Vertigo
50%
14
3
Dust II
59%
17
1
Last 5 maps
Overpass
43%
7
12
Train
0%
0
38
Inferno
53%
19
10
Mirage
74%
19
5
Nuke
48%
21
4
Vertigo
46%
13
13
Dust II
58%
24
0
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of G2 vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between G2 and BIG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Dust II, Mirage, and victory was secured by BIG. The MVP of this match was kennyS.
BIG analytics
The team BIG secured 46 out of 87 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Mirage. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG were tiziaN contributed 70 kills and syrsoN contributed 63 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 31703 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 22 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
G2 analytics
The team G2 managed to secure 41 out of 87 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 8 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for G2 were kennyS contributed 69 kills and huNter- contributed 53 kills. 30079 of total damage by G2 could not prevent BIG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, G2 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments