CYBERSHOKE Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

8

6

+11

132

1:0

6

0

8.8

+52%

17

4

3

+13

80

1:0

5

3

8.4

+44%

14

13

5

+1

86

4:2

3

0

6.8

+21%

13

8

4

+5

86

2:2

3

0

6.7

+17%

9

9

5

0

69

2:2

1

0

5.6

-8%

Total

72

42

23

+30

454

10:6

18

3

7.3

+25%

FAVBET Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

10

16

2

-6

79

3:5

4

0

5.6

-14%

9

15

2

-6

53

3:2

2

0

5.5

-27%

10

14

2

-4

69

0:2

4

0

5.4

-7%

8

14

1

-6

58

0:0

2

0

5.3

-26%

5

15

6

-10

53

0:1

0

0

4.6

-40%

Total

42

74

13

-32

312

6:10

12

0

5.3

-23%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs FAVBET by the Bo3.gg Team

CYBERSHOKE on Inferno Analysis

CYBERSHOKE demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Inferno were FenomeN, who contributed 19 kills, and notineki, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7265 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


FAVBET on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for FAVBET, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for FAVBET on Inferno included mAriX, who contributed 10 kills, and Smash, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4985 total damage, FAVBET couldn't prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, FAVBET struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date