CYBERSHOKE Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

8

1

+14

91

5:0

6

0

8.4

+36%

19

8

6

+11

101

1:1

6

0

7.5

+33%

15

10

4

+5

90

3:1

1

1

7.2

+19%

12

14

12

-2

99

3:2

4

0

6.2

+16%

12

11

3

+1

60

1:2

3

0

5.6

-7%

Total

80

51

26

+29

440

13:6

20

1

7.0

+20%

FAVBET Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

13

14

0

-1

66

1:2

4

1

5.9

-14%

12

16

3

-4

66

1:3

2

1

5.5

-12%

9

16

5

-7

56

2:1

2

0

5.1

-25%

10

19

3

-9

63

1:2

1

1

4.8

-27%

7

18

4

-11

45

1:5

1

0

4.0

-44%

Total

51

83

15

-32

297

6:13

10

3

5.1

-25%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs FAVBET by the Bo3.gg Team

CYBERSHOKE on Anubis Analysis

CYBERSHOKE demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Anubis were FenomeN, who contributed 22 kills, and lov1kus, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8361 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


FAVBET on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for FAVBET, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for FAVBET on Anubis included j3kie, who contributed 13 kills, and mAriX, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5634 total damage, FAVBET couldn't prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, FAVBET struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date