0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:26s
M4A1 kills on a map
74.491
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
46.716.3
GLOCK kills on a map
21.4456
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.34
Molotov kills on a map
21.0811
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.32
Assists on a map
7.54.4098
Teammate kills
1
Suicide
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
64%
Mirage
59%
Nuke
11%
Ancient
11%
Vertigo
7%
Inferno
3%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
75
Mirage
59%
34
12
Nuke
53%
30
19
Ancient
50%
32
20
Vertigo
42%
12
38
Inferno
38%
24
14
Last 5 maps
Anubis
64%
22
3
Mirage
0%
0
60
Nuke
64%
25
5
Ancient
39%
18
20
Vertigo
35%
17
24
Inferno
41%
17
22
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Case vs ODDIK by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Case and ODDIK, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Case. The MVP of this match was RCF.
Case analytics
The team Case secured 11 out of 12 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Case were RCF contributed 10 kills and RICIOLI contributed 12 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 5189 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Case held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ODDIK analytics
The team ODDIK managed to secure 1 out of 12 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ODDIK were WOOD7 contributed 5 kills and Tuurtle contributed 4 kills. 2602 of total damage by ODDIK could not prevent Case from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ODDIK struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments