Ended
Full stats

0 Comments

BLUEJAYS Scoreboard Mirage (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

35

23

9

+12

106

6:6

11

1

7.4

+18%

29

24

5

+5

86

8:4

8

2

6.9

+13%

23

23

8

0

71

2:5

8

0

5.6

-2%

15

24

2

-9

45

0:1

3

0

4.7

-25%

15

26

3

-11

53

2:2

5

0

4.7

-22%

Total

117

120

27

-3

361

18:18

35

3

5.8

-3%

eSuba Scoreboard Mirage (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

32

23

6

+9

89

6:2

9

0

7.1

+19%

27

25

5

+2

83

2:4

7

0

6.0

+10%

23

22

4

+1

71

3:4

8

0

5.8

+4%

18

25

5

-7

64

5:3

4

0

5.4

-18%

20

22

7

-2

65

2:5

5

0

5.3

+11%

Total

120

117

27

+3

371

18:18

33

0

5.9

+5%

Teams advantage Mirage (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of BLUEJAYS vs eSuba by the Bo3.gg Team

BLUEJAYS on Mirage Analysis

BLUEJAYS demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 19 out of 36 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for BLUEJAYS on Mirage were CacaNito, who contributed 35 kills, and aidKiT, who added 29 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 12984 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Mirage, BLUEJAYS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


eSuba on Mirage Analysis

Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for eSuba, as they managed to secure 17 out of 36 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for eSuba on Mirage included Blogg1s, who contributed 32 kills, and Levi, who added 27 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 13368 total damage, eSuba couldn't prevent BLUEJAYS from securing victory on Mirage


On the defensive side of Mirage, eSuba struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date