Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
103
M4A1 kills on a map
214.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
63.916.7
Flash duration on a map (sec)
02:05s00:39s
Player score (round)
34821012
Player score (round)
41751012
Damage (total/round)
38673
Player score (round)
37471012
Player score (round)
36621012
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
44%
Nuke
23%
Vertigo
21%
Mirage
15%
Overpass
13%
Ancient
10%
Dust II
6%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
73%
26
1
Nuke
25%
8
38
Vertigo
62%
21
10
Mirage
73%
40
2
Overpass
38%
13
20
Ancient
42%
19
23
Dust II
44%
18
10
Last 5 maps
Inferno
29%
24
7
Nuke
48%
27
0
Vertigo
41%
17
3
Mirage
58%
33
3
Overpass
25%
8
13
Ancient
32%
19
9
Dust II
50%
2
23
Info
Match analysis of BLUEJAYS vs eSuba by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BLUEJAYS and eSuba, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Mirage, Inferno, and victory was secured by BLUEJAYS. The MVP of this match was CacaNito.
BLUEJAYS analytics
The team BLUEJAYS secured 35 out of 60 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Inferno. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BLUEJAYS were CacaNito contributed 59 kills and aidKiT contributed 48 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22836 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BLUEJAYS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 24 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
eSuba analytics
The team eSuba managed to secure 25 out of 60 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for eSuba were Levi contributed 44 kills and Blogg1s contributed 43 kills. 20480 of total damage by eSuba could not prevent BLUEJAYS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, eSuba struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments