Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:26s
Smoke thrown on a map
2514.6931
Smoke thrown on a map
2814.6931
USP kills on a map
41.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
16.84.7
Player score (round)
45211011
Player score (round)
43071011
Damage (total/round)
39273
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
100%
Anubis
35%
Inferno
30%
Mirage
24%
Vertigo
17%
Ancient
8%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
4
25
Anubis
68%
19
6
Inferno
70%
23
0
Mirage
64%
14
7
Vertigo
83%
6
20
Ancient
52%
23
6
Dust II
0%
0
1
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
2
Anubis
33%
9
4
Inferno
40%
10
1
Mirage
40%
10
0
Vertigo
100%
3
2
Ancient
60%
5
2
Dust II
0%
0
0
Info
Match analysis of BLEED vs DMS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BLEED and DMS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Inferno, and victory was secured by BLEED. The MVP of this match was hampus.
BLEED analytics
The team BLEED secured 26 out of 38 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BLEED were hampus contributed 38 kills and CYPHER contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16754 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BLEED held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DMS analytics
The team DMS managed to secure 12 out of 38 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DMS were AW contributed 33 kills and H1te contributed 20 kills. 12398 of total damage by DMS could not prevent BLEED from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DMS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments