Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
103
HE damage (avg/round)
12.53.4
M4A1 kills on a map
124.6963
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
38481012
Shots (total/round)
11916
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
73%
Ancient
55%
Vertigo
33%
Overpass
24%
Nuke
23%
Dust II
21%
Inferno
9%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
35
Ancient
25%
4
5
Vertigo
33%
9
12
Overpass
33%
9
9
Nuke
71%
21
4
Dust II
50%
10
1
Inferno
50%
16
2
Last 5 maps
Mirage
73%
59
0
Ancient
80%
10
23
Vertigo
0%
1
77
Overpass
57%
21
9
Nuke
48%
27
36
Dust II
71%
28
5
Inferno
59%
29
22
Info
Match analysis of Astralis vs Fiend by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Astralis and Fiend, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by Astralis. The MVP of this match was Bubzkji.
Astralis analytics
The team Astralis secured 33 out of 51 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Inferno. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Astralis were Bubzkji contributed 44 kills and Magisk contributed 36 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19822 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Astralis held their ground firmly, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Fiend analytics
The team Fiend managed to secure 18 out of 51 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Fiend were REDSTAR contributed 30 kills and dream3r contributed 29 kills. 15109 of total damage by Fiend could not prevent Astralis from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Fiend struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments