4glory Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

14

3

+13

98

3:2

7

2

8.5

+27%

24

16

6

+8

96

6:2

7

2

8.0

+36%

21

14

8

+7

81

6:1

6

0

7.3

+28%

16

15

8

+1

75

1:3

3

0

5.9

+6%

10

16

6

-6

60

0:1

2

0

5.0

-14%

Total

98

75

31

+23

411

16:9

25

4

6.9

+17%

Good Game Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

19

3

0

79

2:0

3

1

6.7

0%

18

18

1

0

69

2:2

5

0

5.9

+8%

12

18

4

-6

60

1:3

1

0

4.9

-13%

14

21

1

-7

62

2:7

3

0

4.9

-19%

10

22

5

-12

65

2:4

2

0

4.8

-26%

Total

73

98

14

-25

335

9:16

14

1

5.5

-10%

Teams advantage Inferno (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of 4glory vs Good Game by the Bo3.gg Team

4glory on Inferno Analysis

4glory demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for 4glory on Inferno were c0llins, who contributed 27 kills, and aVN, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10266 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, 4glory held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Good Game on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Good Game, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Good Game on Inferno included aidKiT, who contributed 19 kills, and dan1, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8365 total damage, Good Game couldn't prevent 4glory from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Good Game struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date