PROSPECTS Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

15

3

0

80

0:4

5

0

5.9

+3%

14

14

3

0

80

2:4

3

0

5.9

+5%

10

17

2

-7

56

2:2

2

0

4.9

-28%

9

18

1

-9

34

0:4

2

0

4.1

-36%

7

18

2

-11

42

0:3

2

1

4.1

-39%

Total

55

82

11

-27

292

4:17

14

1

5.0

-19%

Savage Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

22

12

6

+10

104

5:1

4

1

8.7

+35%

19

11

5

+8

87

4:1

6

2

7.6

+36%

17

11

4

+6

92

3:0

5

0

7.2

+20%

15

15

7

0

86

4:1

4

0

6.8

+31%

8

9

4

-1

42

1:1

3

1

5.1

-15%

Total

81

58

26

+23

412

17:4

22

4

7.1

+21%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of PROSPECTS vs Savage by the Bo3.gg Team

Savage on Inferno Analysis

Savage demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Savage on Inferno were grux, who contributed 22 kills, and TENZKI, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8647 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Savage held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


PROSPECTS on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for PROSPECTS, as they managed to secure 5 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for PROSPECTS on Inferno included spooke, who contributed 15 kills, and LaX, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6132 total damage, PROSPECTS couldn't prevent Savage from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, PROSPECTS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date