0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle damage (avg/round)
19.75.4
AK47 kills on a map
176.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
6725.3
USP damage (avg/round)
13.84.6
M4A1 kills on a map
114.6963
Player score (round)
44621012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
100%
Dust II
64%
Mirage
51%
Overpass
45%
Ancient
23%
Inferno
20%
Vertigo
16%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
3
3
Dust II
100%
4
3
Mirage
20%
5
1
Overpass
83%
6
0
Ancient
83%
6
0
Inferno
43%
7
1
Vertigo
60%
10
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
1
29
Dust II
36%
14
9
Mirage
71%
7
10
Overpass
38%
16
4
Ancient
60%
15
6
Inferno
63%
16
3
Vertigo
44%
16
3
Info
Match analysis of PROSPECTS vs Savage by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PROSPECTS and Savage, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Overpass, Vertigo, Inferno, and victory was secured by PROSPECTS. The MVP of this match was grux.
PROSPECTS analytics
The team PROSPECTS secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PROSPECTS were spooke contributed 60 kills and adeX contributed 55 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26450 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PROSPECTS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Savage analytics
The team Savage managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Savage were grux contributed 62 kills and draken contributed 54 kills. 25808 of total damage by Savage could not prevent PROSPECTS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Savage struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments