0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Série de victoires de l'équipe
103
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8064
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
22.25.6
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
14.34.6
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
41.4398
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
11.23.8
Éliminations avec Desert Eagle en moyenne par carte
41.6964
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
13.24.6
Score du joueur (round)
34681012
Score du joueur (round)
36141012
Informations
Map Analysis of PROSPECTS vs Savage by the Bo3.gg Team
Savage on Inferno Analysis
Savage demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Savage on Inferno were grux, who contributed 22 kills, and TENZKI, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8647 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Savage held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
PROSPECTS on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for PROSPECTS, as they managed to secure 5 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for PROSPECTS on Inferno included spooke, who contributed 15 kills, and LaX, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6132 total damage, PROSPECTS couldn't prevent Savage from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, PROSPECTS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires