0 Comentários
226
211
47
+15
387
28:35
50
6
Overpass6.4
+7%
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Escalação
escalação
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Dust II
60%
Ancient
53%
Anubis
50%
Vertigo
32%
Inferno
19%
Overpass
17%
Mirage
11%
Nuke
3%
Últimos 5 mapas
Dust II
60%
10
3
Ancient
0%
3
18
Anubis
50%
2
2
Vertigo
70%
10
7
Inferno
21%
24
3
Overpass
33%
6
9
Mirage
55%
33
1
Nuke
50%
18
1
Últimos 5 mapas
Dust II
0%
0
9
Ancient
53%
17
2
Anubis
0%
1
4
Vertigo
38%
13
2
Inferno
40%
10
8
Overpass
50%
12
1
Mirage
44%
9
3
Nuke
53%
17
1
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- lVVlV
- llllV
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Genk by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and Genk, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Overpass, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was aVN.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 0 out of 63 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were aVN contributed 56 kills and Cjoffo contributed 43 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 24508 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Genk analytics
The team Genk managed to secure 63 out of 63 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Genk were Ryu contributed 54 kills and Askan contributed 44 kills. 22574 of total damage by Genk could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Genk struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 33 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários