0 Comentários
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:32s01:27s
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:23s01:27s
Dano por USP (média/rodada)
134.7
HE kills no mapa
21.1235
Danos por Galil (média/rodada)
17.25.7
Dano por USP (média/rodada)
13.84.7
Múltiplos kills x-
4
Clutch (adversários)
3
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Mirage
47%
Anubis
31%
Inferno
19%
Vertigo
15%
Ancient
11%
Nuke
6%
Overpass
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Mirage
72%
18
7
Anubis
53%
19
10
Inferno
75%
8
13
Vertigo
40%
15
9
Ancient
79%
19
7
Nuke
50%
12
9
Overpass
0%
0
40
Últimos 5 mapas
Mirage
25%
32
33
Anubis
84%
32
1
Inferno
56%
16
15
Vertigo
55%
22
16
Ancient
68%
25
19
Nuke
44%
32
15
Overpass
0%
0
72
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was saffee.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were saffee contributed 18 kills and insani contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8251 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sharks were doc contributed 17 kills and rdnzao contributed 12 kills. 6970 of total damage by Sharks could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários