0 Comentários
45
81
9
-36
287
7:11
11
1
-27%
Vantagens da equipe Inferno (M1)
Registros Inferno
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Danos por Tec-9 (média/rodada)
11.83.4
Porcentagem de tiros na cabeça
38%15%
M4A1 kills no mapa
104.6963
Danos por M4A1 (média/rodada)
6116.7
Danos por GLOCK (média/rodada)
15.33.8
Dano de molotov (média/rodada)
12.22
Duração do flash no mapa (sec)
01:15s00:39s
Flash cego no mapa (opp)
5130
Abertura kills no mapa
7.032.9135
Tiros (total/rodada)
10016
Info
Map Analysis of Looking For Org vs Paradox by the Bo3.gg Team
Paradox on Inferno Analysis
Paradox demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 15 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Paradox on Inferno were chelleos, who contributed 20 kills, and DannyG, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8215 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Paradox held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Looking For Org on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Looking For Org, as they managed to secure 4 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Looking For Org on Inferno included soju_j, who contributed 12 kills, and HUGHMUNGUS, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5459 total damage, Looking For Org couldn't prevent Paradox from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Looking For Org struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários