0 Comments
45
81
9
-36
287
7:11
11
1
-27%
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Records Inferno
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
11.83.4
Percentage of headshots
38%15%
M4A1 kills on a map
104.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
6116.7
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
15.33.8
Molotov damage (avg/round)
12.22
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:15s00:39s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5130
Openning kills on a map
7.032.9135
Shots (total/round)
10016
Info
Map Analysis of Looking For Org vs Paradox by the Bo3.gg Team
Paradox on Inferno Analysis
Paradox demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 15 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Paradox on Inferno were chelleos, who contributed 20 kills, and DannyG, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8215 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Paradox held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Looking For Org on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Looking For Org, as they managed to secure 4 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Looking For Org on Inferno included soju_j, who contributed 12 kills, and HUGHMUNGUS, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5459 total damage, Looking For Org couldn't prevent Paradox from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Looking For Org struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments