0 Comentários
111
126
19
-15
342
13:22
27
6
Nuke5.7
-2%
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Escalação
escalação
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Ancient
100%
Vertigo
75%
Mirage
42%
Nuke
22%
Inferno
6%
Dust II
0%
Overpass
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Ancient
100%
2
0
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Mirage
0%
4
0
Nuke
67%
3
0
Inferno
33%
6
0
Dust II
50%
2
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Últimos 5 mapas
Ancient
0%
0
6
Vertigo
25%
4
6
Mirage
42%
19
1
Nuke
45%
11
2
Inferno
27%
15
0
Dust II
50%
10
1
Overpass
0%
2
4
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- VVlVl
- VlVll
Info
Match analysis of Leo vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Leo and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Leo. The MVP of this match was brutmonster.
Leo analytics
The team Leo secured 0 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Leo were muR contributed 30 kills and foben contributed 31 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 13253 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Leo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity managed to secure 35 out of 35 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were brutmonster contributed 34 kills and Cjoffo contributed 22 kills. 11966 of total damage by Zero Tenacity could not prevent Leo from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários