0 Comentários
Vantagem das equipes
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Dano de molotov (média/rodada)
6.92
AK47 kills no mapa
166.732
AK47 damage (média/rodada)
67.925.3
M4A4 kills no mapa
133.6448
Danos por M4A4 (média/rodada)
50.712.7
M4A4 kills no mapa
93.6448
Danos por M4A4 (média/rodada)
37.712.7
Danos por Tec-9 (média/rodada)
10.83.4
Deagle kills no mapa
51.6964
Danos por Deagle (média/rodada)
205.4
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Mirage
38%
Inferno
19%
Train
17%
Nuke
10%
Vertigo
8%
Dust II
0%
Overpass
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Mirage
38%
8
6
Inferno
33%
12
5
Train
50%
8
15
Nuke
57%
14
5
Vertigo
58%
12
1
Dust II
50%
10
1
Overpass
0%
5
21
Últimos 5 mapas
Mirage
0%
0
3
Inferno
14%
7
1
Train
67%
3
2
Nuke
67%
3
5
Vertigo
50%
4
0
Dust II
50%
4
1
Overpass
0%
0
4
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Info
Match analysis of G2 vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between G2 and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Nuke, Dust II, Train, and victory was secured by G2. The MVP of this match was AMANEK.
G2 analytics
The team G2 secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Train. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for G2 were AMANEK contributed 77 kills and huNter- contributed 73 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 35992 overall damage.
On the defensive side, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were trk contributed 68 kills and kNgV- contributed 70 kills. 32784 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent G2 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários