0 Comentários
73
51
20
+22
400
10:9
15
1
Anubis6.8
0%
Vantagem das equipes
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Galil kills no mapa
61.8161
Galil kills no mapa
51.8161
Rodada rápida (sec)
00:28s01:54s
Rodada rápida (sec)
00:27s01:54s
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Ancient
67%
Overpass
50%
Vertigo
50%
Anubis
50%
Nuke
L
33%
Inferno
25%
Mirage
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Ancient
67%
3
1
Overpass
100%
2
0
Vertigo
50%
2
1
Anubis
100%
1
2
Nuke
0%
0
3
Inferno
100%
1
2
Mirage
0%
1
0
Últimos 5 mapas
Ancient
0%
2
1
Overpass
50%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Anubis
50%
6
1
Nuke
33%
3
0
Inferno
75%
4
1
Mirage
0%
0
2
Info
Match analysis of ENEIDA vs LOADING by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ENEIDA and LOADING, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by ENEIDA. The MVP of this match was munch.
ENEIDA analytics
The team ENEIDA secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ENEIDA were munch contributed 20 kills and byr9 contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7609 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ENEIDA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LOADING analytics
The team LOADING managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LOADING were SIXER contributed 14 kills and devoduvek contributed 11 kills. 5830 of total damage by LOADING could not prevent ENEIDA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LOADING struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários