0 Comentários
73
104
28
-31
342
8:16
17
2
-1%
Vantagens da equipe Anubis (M1)
Registros Anubis
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:28s01:30s
Danos por M4A4 (média/rodada)
44.212.7
Danos por M4A1 (média/rodada)
60.416.7
Tec-9 kills em um mapa
31.3055
Danos por Tec-9 (média/rodada)
15.13.4
Kills por Molotov no mapa
31.0849
Dano de molotov (média/rodada)
7.72
Eco ganha compra integral
1
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
36781012
Múltiplos kills x-
4
Info
Map Analysis of Detonate SparX vs Factor Ruby by the Bo3.gg Team
Detonate SparX on Anubis Analysis
Detonate SparX demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 15 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Detonate SparX on Anubis were Kionetta, who contributed 29 kills, and Chowdz, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 10855 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Detonate SparX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Factor Ruby on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Factor Ruby, as they managed to secure 10 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Factor Ruby on Anubis included PippySippy, who contributed 15 kills, and Reef, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8562 total damage, Factor Ruby couldn't prevent Detonate SparX from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Factor Ruby struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários