0 Comentários
176
142
46
+34
383
31:17
47
5
Nuke6.4
+3%
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
35691012
Danos (total/rodada)
39273
Múltiplos kills x-
4
Kills por Zeus
1
Dano HE (total/rodada)
8926.8
Duração do flash numa rodada (sec)
00:22s00:05s
Duração do flash numa rodada (sec)
00:19s00:05s
Plante no último segundo
02:14s
Danos por HE (média/rodada)
14.23.4
Danos por HE (média/rodada)
14.43.4
Escalação
escalação
Substituto
Substituto
Substituto
Substituto
Substituto
escalação
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Dust II
75%
Ancient
46%
Inferno
39%
Nuke
23%
Mirage
15%
Overpass
9%
Vertigo
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Dust II
75%
20
10
Ancient
46%
13
19
Inferno
47%
30
14
Nuke
59%
22
7
Mirage
38%
16
17
Overpass
63%
24
7
Vertigo
0%
0
43
Últimos 5 mapas
Dust II
0%
0
16
Ancient
0%
2
11
Inferno
8%
13
4
Nuke
36%
14
3
Mirage
23%
13
2
Overpass
54%
13
1
Vertigo
0%
3
17
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- lVVVl
- Vllll
Info
Match analysis of Bad News Bears vs Third Impact by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Bad News Bears and Third Impact, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by Bad News Bears. The MVP of this match was MoMo.
Bad News Bears analytics
The team Bad News Bears secured 33 out of 50 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Nuke. They also successfully set 10 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Bad News Bears were MoMo contributed 40 kills and Pluto contributed 44 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19166 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Bad News Bears held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Third Impact analytics
The team Third Impact managed to secure 17 out of 50 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Third Impact were RZU contributed 30 kills and DaneJoris contributed 26 kills. 15701 of total damage by Third Impact could not prevent Bad News Bears from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Third Impact struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários