KPI Gaming Tablica wyników

+/-

MAPY SWW

Obecnie nie ma żadnych danych
Case Esports Tablica wyników

+/-

MAPY SWW

Obecnie nie ma żadnych danych
Clash.gg 3 cases
Składy
  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

Obecnie nie ma składu drużyny
  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

Obecnie nie ma składu drużyny
Przewaga drużyn

Obecnie nie ma żadnych danych dotyczących gier
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy

Bind

100%

Breeze

100%

Icebox

100%

Lotus

80%

Fracture

60%

Pearl

50%

Ascent

37%

Split

35%

Haven

6%

Ostatnie 5 map

Bind

0%

0

Breeze

0%

1

Icebox

0%

1

l

Lotus

100%

5

w
w
w
w
w

Fracture

0%

0

Pearl

50%

4

w
w
l
l

Ascent

33%

3

l
w
l

Split

25%

4

l
l
w

Haven

20%

5

l
l
l
l

Ostatnie 5 map

Bind

100%

3

w
w
w

Breeze

100%

1

Icebox

100%

1

w

Lotus

20%

5

l
w
l
l
l

Fracture

60%

5

w
w
w
l
l

Pearl

0%

0

Ascent

70%

10

w
w
l
w
l

Split

60%

5

w
w
l
l

Haven

14%

7

w
l
l
l
l
Informacja
Match analysis of KPI Gaming vs Case Esports by the Bo3.gg Team

In the Valorant match between KPI Gaming and Case Esports, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Split, Breeze, Haven, and victory was secured by Case Esports. The MVP of this match was .


Case Esports analytics

The team Case Esports secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Split, Breeze. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.


The standout players for Case Esports were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.


On the defensive side, Case Esports held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


KPI Gaming analytics

The team KPI Gaming managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for KPI Gaming were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by KPI Gaming could not prevent Case Esports from securing the victory


On the defensive side, KPI Gaming struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Komentarze
Według daty