0 Commentaires
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Composition de l'équipe
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Derniers résultats
Matchs précédents
- pppgg
- pppgp
Avantages des équipes
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Bind
100%
Breeze
100%
Icebox
100%
Lotus
80%
Fracture
60%
Pearl
50%
Ascent
37%
Split
35%
Haven
6%
Dernières 5 cartes
Bind
0%
0
Breeze
0%
1
Icebox
0%
1
Lotus
100%
5
Fracture
0%
0
Pearl
50%
4
Ascent
33%
3
Split
25%
4
Haven
20%
5
Dernières 5 cartes
Bind
100%
3
Breeze
100%
1
Icebox
100%
1
Lotus
20%
5
Fracture
60%
5
Pearl
0%
0
Ascent
70%
10
Split
60%
5
Haven
14%
7
Informations
Match analysis of KPI Gaming vs Case Esports by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between KPI Gaming and Case Esports, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Split, Breeze, Haven, and victory was secured by Case Esports. The MVP of this match was .
Case Esports analytics
The team Case Esports secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Split, Breeze. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Case Esports were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Case Esports held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
KPI Gaming analytics
The team KPI Gaming managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for KPI Gaming were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by KPI Gaming could not prevent Case Esports from securing the victory
On the defensive side, KPI Gaming struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires