0 Comments
87
37
14
+50
488
11:7
25
0
+37%
Teams advantage Mirage (M0)
Records Mirage
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
1615.0371
AWP kills on a map
156.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
81.321.6
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4398
M4A1 kills on a map
144.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
70.616.7
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
47.116.7
Kills on a map
28.9817.5558
Damage (avg/round)
141.21939.7
Shots (total/round)
8916
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Strive in chaos by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Mirage Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 16 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Mirage were brutmonster, who contributed 29 kills, and peanutworld, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 8777 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Strive in chaos on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for Strive in chaos, as they managed to secure 2 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Strive in chaos on Mirage included ROGA, who contributed 16 kills, and MUFFY, who added 7 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4233 total damage, Strive in chaos couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, Strive in chaos struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments