0 Comments
52
84
14
-32
321
6:13
10
1
-20%
Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
133
M4A1 kills on a map
124.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
59.116.7
M4A1 kills on a map
114.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
68.416.7
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4398
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
15.33.8
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.92
Galil damage (avg/round)
19.95.6
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:34s00:39s
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Strive in chaos by the Bo3.gg Team
Strive in chaos on Inferno Analysis
Strive in chaos demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Strive in chaos on Inferno were ROGA, who contributed 18 kills, and Maki, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8563 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Strive in chaos held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 3 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno included Cjoffo, who contributed 13 kills, and simke, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6101 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent Strive in chaos from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments