0 Comments
77
65
21
+12
383
15:7
22
1
Overpass6.4
+7%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Player score (round)
34791011
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
64%
Inferno
50%
Ancient
33%
Anubis
22%
Overpass
21%
Mirage
13%
Vertigo
11%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
64%
33
3
Inferno
50%
22
16
Ancient
0%
0
66
Anubis
65%
48
0
Overpass
46%
26
30
Mirage
37%
35
16
Vertigo
56%
27
15
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
4
Inferno
0%
2
0
Ancient
33%
9
0
Anubis
43%
7
0
Overpass
25%
4
1
Mirage
50%
8
0
Vertigo
67%
3
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwllw
- llwll
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs NOM by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and NOM, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was nEMANHA.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were nEMANHA contributed 17 kills and simke contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8433 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NOM analytics
The team NOM managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NOM were Libido contributed 19 kills and meztal contributed 15 kills. 7041 of total damage by NOM could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NOM struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments