0 Comments
Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
L
55%
Vertigo
34%
Dust II
32%
Overpass
L
27%
Nuke
L
21%
Inferno
L
9%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
45%
29
1
Vertigo
67%
3
8
Dust II
75%
12
3
Overpass
33%
3
11
Nuke
50%
16
2
Inferno
24%
21
1
Ancient
0%
3
11
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
2
4
Vertigo
33%
3
0
Dust II
43%
7
1
Overpass
60%
5
2
Nuke
71%
17
0
Inferno
33%
3
2
Ancient
0%
0
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwll
- wwlwl
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs LF0 by the Bo3.gg Team
LF0 on Nuke Analysis
LF0 demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 0 out of 36 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for LF0 on Nuke were JACKPOT, who contributed 35 kills, and SP1NT, who added 32 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 14052 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, LF0 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 36 out of 36 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Nuke included fajkus, who contributed 28 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 25 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 13385 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent LF0 from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments