Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

10

7

+7

107

2:1

6

0

7.8

+24%

16

9

5

+7

92

4:2

3

0

7.5

+24%

18

8

4

+10

82

0:1

6

1

7.3

+34%

14

13

6

+1

93

4:0

1

0

7.2

+23%

8

12

5

-4

58

3:1

0

0

5.6

-16%

Total

73

52

27

+21

431

13:5

16

1

7.1

+18%

kONO Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

13

4

+4

85

1:0

4

2

7.4

+17%

10

17

6

-7

80

1:3

2

0

5.2

-14%

10

15

4

-5

63

0:3

2

0

4.9

-19%

7

15

4

-8

53

3:3

0

0

4.8

-32%

8

13

2

-5

52

0:4

1

0

4.4

-27%

Total

52

73

20

-21

334

5:13

9

2

5.3

-15%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs kONO by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were nEMANHA, who contributed 17 kills, and brutmonster, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7752 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


kONO on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for kONO, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for kONO on Anubis included amster, who contributed 17 kills, and s4ltovsk1yy, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6015 total damage, kONO couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, kONO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date