0 Comments
76
56
14
+20
426
14:5
17
2
+17%
Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Nuke
40%
Ancient
33%
Vertigo
28%
Anubis
16%
Inferno
13%
Mirage
1%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
2
3
Nuke
73%
37
6
Ancient
0%
0
78
Vertigo
28%
32
21
Anubis
62%
85
0
Inferno
46%
26
17
Mirage
56%
39
21
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
2
0
Nuke
33%
3
5
Ancient
33%
15
3
Vertigo
0%
0
8
Anubis
46%
13
3
Inferno
33%
3
0
Mirage
57%
7
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwlw
- wlwlw
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs GUN5 by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were Cjoffo, who contributed 18 kills, and aVN, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8085 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
GUN5 on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for GUN5, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for GUN5 on Anubis included SELLTER, who contributed 14 kills, and Easy, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6426 total damage, GUN5 couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, GUN5 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments