0 Comments
73
46
18
+27
423
12:6
17
2
+18%
Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Records Nuke
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:19s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:25s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:21s01:26s
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.65.8
Smoke thrown on a map
1714.6931
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.44
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3023
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
13.43.5
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
51.616.3
USP kills on a map
41.6074
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Grannys Knockers by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Nuke Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Nuke were brutmonster, who contributed 19 kills, and simke, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 7606 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Grannys Knockers on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Grannys Knockers, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Grannys Knockers on Nuke included Sidivo, who contributed 11 kills, and slokker, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5656 total damage, Grannys Knockers couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, Grannys Knockers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments