0 Comments
80
67
33
+13
439
12:7
17
3
+12%
Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Records Anubis
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:24s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:30s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:26s
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.14
M4A1 kills on a map
104.491
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
45.916.3
HE damage (avg/round)
12.63.4
USP kills on a map
41.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
15.44.7
Galil kills on a map
61.8171
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Grannys Knockers by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were nEMANHA, who contributed 22 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8344 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Grannys Knockers on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Grannys Knockers, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Grannys Knockers on Anubis included slokker, who contributed 16 kills, and BaGyZ, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7121 total damage, Grannys Knockers couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Grannys Knockers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments