Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
104.491
M4A1 kills on a map
84.491
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Speed Round (sec)
00:25s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:16s01:55s
Player score (round)
35071011
Damage (total/round)
47373
Player score (round)
60071011
Player's aces
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
55%
Anubis
21%
Mirage
12%
Nuke
5%
Ancient
2%
Dust II
0%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
55%
11
0
Anubis
29%
17
1
Mirage
28%
18
1
Nuke
20%
5
6
Ancient
45%
20
1
Dust II
60%
5
0
Vertigo
0%
0
7
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
5
8
Anubis
50%
10
0
Mirage
40%
5
1
Nuke
25%
8
3
Ancient
47%
15
0
Dust II
60%
5
3
Vertigo
0%
1
9
Info
Match analysis of Yawara vs KRÜ by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Yawara and KRÜ, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Anubis, and victory was secured by KRÜ. The MVP of this match was laser.
KRÜ analytics
The team KRÜ secured 26 out of 38 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Anubis. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for KRÜ were laser contributed 31 kills and atarax1a contributed 31 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14669 overall damage.
On the defensive side, KRÜ held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Yawara analytics
The team Yawara managed to secure 12 out of 38 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Yawara were j0w contributed 24 kills and lash contributed 19 kills. 11489 of total damage by Yawara could not prevent KRÜ from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Yawara struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments