0 Comments
Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
60%
Inferno
50%
Vertigo
50%
Overpass
43%
Nuke
23%
Mirage
20%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
1
1
Inferno
25%
4
5
Vertigo
0%
4
2
Overpass
0%
1
4
Nuke
58%
12
1
Mirage
40%
5
3
Dust II
50%
4
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
60%
20
0
Inferno
75%
4
0
Vertigo
50%
12
0
Overpass
43%
7
0
Nuke
35%
23
0
Mirage
20%
5
0
Dust II
50%
6
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllwl
- wlwww
Info
Map Analysis of xDDDD vs ThunderFlash by the Bo3.gg Team
ThunderFlash on Nuke Analysis
ThunderFlash demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 24 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ThunderFlash on Nuke were swiz, who contributed 21 kills, and Moon, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9702 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, ThunderFlash held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
xDDDD on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for xDDDD, as they managed to secure 0 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for xDDDD on Nuke included ViRESUS, who contributed 24 kills, and PASHANOJ, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8714 total damage, xDDDD couldn't prevent ThunderFlash from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, xDDDD struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments