0 Comments
51
92
17
-41
290
7:14
9
0
0%
Teams advantage Vertigo (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- —
- Starter
- —
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
75%
Overpass
F
60%
Ancient
58%
Dust II
50%
Vertigo
50%
Nuke
25%
Mirage
20%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Overpass
100%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
75%
4
0
Overpass
40%
5
0
Ancient
58%
19
0
Dust II
50%
6
0
Vertigo
50%
12
0
Nuke
25%
20
0
Mirage
20%
5
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Map Analysis of FlashP0int vs ThunderFlash by the Bo3.gg Team
ThunderFlash on Vertigo Analysis
ThunderFlash demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 16 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ThunderFlash on Vertigo were Moon, who contributed 21 kills, and Mride, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 9553 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, ThunderFlash held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
FlashP0int on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for FlashP0int, as they managed to secure 5 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for FlashP0int on Vertigo included rhythm, who contributed 15 kills, and rommi, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6099 total damage, FlashP0int couldn't prevent ThunderFlash from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, FlashP0int struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments