Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
176.5807
Tec-9 kills on a map
51.3052
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
15.33.4
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
37.712.7
Player score (round)
46881012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
65%
Inferno
39%
Vertigo
33%
Ancient
30%
Mirage
10%
Overpass
9%
Nuke
2%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
65%
17
0
Inferno
21%
14
21
Vertigo
0%
0
38
Ancient
41%
17
11
Mirage
57%
14
5
Overpass
42%
12
13
Nuke
48%
25
1
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
1
Inferno
60%
5
0
Vertigo
33%
3
0
Ancient
71%
7
0
Mirage
67%
6
0
Overpass
33%
3
1
Nuke
50%
4
0
Info
Match analysis of WINDINGO vs AJF by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between WINDINGO and AJF, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by AJF. The MVP of this match was urban0.
AJF analytics
The team AJF secured 43 out of 80 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Inferno. They also successfully set 10 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AJF were urban0 contributed 64 kills and Pigo contributed 53 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 28090 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AJF held their ground firmly, successfully defending 29 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
WINDINGO analytics
The team WINDINGO managed to secure 37 out of 80 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 7 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for WINDINGO were restik contributed 56 kills and fakzwall contributed 50 kills. 27110 of total damage by WINDINGO could not prevent AJF from securing the victory
On the defensive side, WINDINGO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 24 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments