Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.6027
Damage (total/round)
50073
Player score (round)
36461010
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
100%
Mirage
100%
Ancient
67%
Anubis
50%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
0
Mirage
0%
2
0
Ancient
0%
3
0
Anubis
50%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Mirage
100%
2
0
Ancient
67%
3
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllll
- wlwwl
Info
Match analysis of Waterboarding Fan Club vs LazerrFreeks8 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Waterboarding Fan Club and LazerrFreeks8, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by LazerrFreeks8. The MVP of this match was shoosT.
LazerrFreeks8 analytics
The team LazerrFreeks8 secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LazerrFreeks8 were shoosT contributed 22 kills and peppa contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8942 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LazerrFreeks8 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Waterboarding Fan Club analytics
The team Waterboarding Fan Club managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Waterboarding Fan Club were sathsea contributed 22 kills and Hyena contributed 12 kills. 8287 of total damage by Waterboarding Fan Club could not prevent LazerrFreeks8 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Waterboarding Fan Club struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments