0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Lineup
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
59%
Overpass
44%
Mirage
23%
Inferno
14%
Vertigo
14%
Nuke
13%
Dust II
11%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
59%
17
0
Overpass
0%
2
12
Mirage
50%
8
10
Inferno
33%
18
1
Vertigo
53%
19
0
Nuke
56%
18
1
Dust II
33%
12
2
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
2
10
Overpass
44%
18
4
Mirage
73%
26
0
Inferno
47%
17
4
Vertigo
67%
3
8
Nuke
43%
14
1
Dust II
44%
16
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwll
- lwwwl
Info
Match analysis of VP.Prodigy vs Budapest Five by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between VP.Prodigy and Budapest Five, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by Budapest Five. The MVP of this match was latt1kk.
Budapest Five analytics
The team Budapest Five secured 0 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Budapest Five were Aaron contributed 24 kills and fleav contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9135 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Budapest Five held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
VP.Prodigy analytics
The team VP.Prodigy managed to secure 28 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for VP.Prodigy were latt1kk contributed 25 kills and r3salt contributed 25 kills. 10536 of total damage by VP.Prodigy could not prevent Budapest Five from securing the victory
On the defensive side, VP.Prodigy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments