0 Comments
Teams advantage Overpass (M1)
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
59%
Overpass
44%
Mirage
23%
Inferno
14%
Vertigo
14%
Nuke
13%
Dust II
11%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
59%
17
0
Overpass
0%
2
12
Mirage
50%
8
10
Inferno
33%
18
1
Vertigo
53%
19
0
Nuke
56%
18
1
Dust II
33%
12
2
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
2
10
Overpass
44%
18
4
Mirage
73%
26
0
Inferno
47%
17
4
Vertigo
67%
3
8
Nuke
43%
14
1
Dust II
44%
16
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwll
- lwwwl
Info
Map Analysis of VP.Prodigy vs Budapest Five by the Bo3.gg Team
Budapest Five on Overpass Analysis
Budapest Five demonstrated their prowers on Overpass, securing 0 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Budapest Five on Overpass were Aaron, who contributed 24 kills, and fleav, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Overpass, the team inflicted a total of 9135 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Overpass, Budapest Five held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
VP.Prodigy on Overpass Analysis
Overpass proved to be a challenging battleground for VP.Prodigy, as they managed to secure 28 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for VP.Prodigy on Overpass included latt1kk, who contributed 25 kills, and r3salt, who added 25 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10536 total damage, VP.Prodigy couldn't prevent Budapest Five from securing victory on Overpass
On the defensive side of Overpass, VP.Prodigy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments