Virtus.pro Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

12

10

3

+2

64

2:1

4

0

6.0

+1%

12

12

3

0

65

0:3

4

0

5.2

-3%

7

13

2

-6

52

2:2

3

0

4.6

-21%

7

12

5

-5

55

2:5

2

0

4.6

-23%

8

16

2

-8

57

0:2

2

0

4.4

-27%

Total

46

63

15

-17

294

6:13

15

0

5.0

-15%

FURIA Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

11

6

+7

95

5:2

4

0

8.1

+37%

18

8

9

+10

111

2:2

6

0

7.8

+33%

13

11

4

+2

71

2:1

3

0

6.1

+7%

8

12

4

-4

66

3:0

0

0

5.6

-17%

5

8

2

-3

29

1:1

0

1

4.6

-27%

Total

62

50

25

+12

373

13:6

13

1

6.4

+7%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Virtus.pro vs FURIA by the Bo3.gg Team

FURIA on Inferno Analysis

FURIA demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for FURIA on Inferno were chelo, who contributed 18 kills, and KSCERATO, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7081 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, FURIA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Virtus.pro on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Virtus.pro, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Virtus.pro on Inferno included Jame, who contributed 12 kills, and electroNic, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5588 total damage, Virtus.pro couldn't prevent FURIA from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Virtus.pro struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date